[General] Naturalness of the following expressions in American English

Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Mandel1

New member
Joined
Mar 25, 2021
Member Type
Interested in Language
Native Language
Chinese
Home Country
Singapore
Current Location
Singapore
Hi all,

This is my first post. I do web novel translations part-time for a Chinese company (Chinese to English). I am not a native speaker of English, so please feel free to point out my errors. :)

Just last week, I was asked to translate a chapter of a manhua (Chinese comic strip). Since the client was important, my translation was edited many times, with plenty of emendations. The client asked for American English, but I was brought up using British English.

One editor is based in the US, and I assume he/she is a native speaker of American English. Most of his/her emendations are clear improvements, but I'm wondering about a few others.

These include:

1) No matter how I see it --> No matter how I look at it
(Is there a difference between these two, or is the second the only one correct?)

2) Which class are you two from? --> Which class are you two in? (Are both acceptable, or is the second more correct in AE?)

3) Didn't you hear me? I called you so many times! --> Are you deaf? I've been calling you! (Which sounds more natural? The speaker is a teacher who is a little angry with an unresponsive student. The literal meaning is more like the first, but isn't the emended version a little rude?)

4) It's too high up! I can't reach it! --> It's too high! I can't reach it! (Is "too high up" wrong?)

5) Wow, he's so tall! Is he 1.9 meters... ? --> Wow, he's so tall! Isn't he like 1.9 meters? (I know the second is correct, but does the first sound natural in AE or BrE?)

I'm asking this because I want to know if my English is good enough to translate comic strips, which demand more idiomatic, informal, natural-sounding English. I was brought up under the British system, so please feel free to point out any differences between BrE and AE (if any) in the examples above. Any input will be much appreciated!
 
Mandel1 said:
Hi all,

This is my first post. I do web novel translations part-time for a Chinese company (Chinese to English). I am not a native speaker of English, so please feel free to point out my errors. :)

Just last week, I was asked to translate a chapter of a manhua (Chinese comic strip). Since the client was important, my translation was edited many times, with plenty of emendations. The client asked for American English, but I was brought up using British English.

One editor is based in the US, and I assume he/she is a native speaker of American English. Most of his/her emendations are clear improvements, but I'm wondering about a few others.

These include:

1) No matter how I see it --> No matter how I look at it
(Is there a difference between these two, or is the second the only one correct?)

"No matter how I see it" is a bit unnatural. It's hard to think of a context in which it would be used.

2) Which class are you two from? --> Which class are you two in? (Are both acceptable, or is the second more correct in AE?)

"From" would rarely if ever be used when "class" pertains to school.

3) Didn't you hear me? I called you so many times! --> Are you deaf? I've been calling you! (Which sounds more natural? The speaker is a teacher who is a little angry with an unresponsive student. The literal meaning is more like the first, but isn't the emended version a little rude?)

Yes, it's a bit rude. But perhaps the teacher was so exasperated they chose to be rude. But both are otherwise acceptable.

4) It's too high up! I can't reach it! --> It's too high! I can't reach it! (Is "too high up" wrong?)

No.

5) Wow, he's so tall! Is he 1.9 meters... ? --> Wow, he's so tall! Isn't he like 1.9 meters? (I know the second is correct, but does the first sound natural in AE or BrE?)

Yes in AmE.

I'm asking this because I want to know if my English is good enough to translate comic strips, which demand more idiomatic, informal, natural-sounding English. I was brought up under the British system, so please feel free to point out any differences between BrE and AE (if any) in the examples above. Any input will be much appreciated!
Click to expand...

See my comments above.
 
Context would help.

1. "How I see it" and "how I look at it" can mean different things.

2. Which kind of class are you talking about?

3. "Are you deaf?" would be seen as offensive nowadays. It was at one time perfectly natural, though rude.

4. "Too high up" is not wrong or unnatural. It works either way.

5. Nothing with meters is natural in AmE. The "isn't he?" formation is natural. "Isn't he 6 foot 2?"

High
 
"Are you deaf?" in that context is very offensive.

The height question is of course only natural in American English if it uses feet and inches. The speaker might say Isn't he, like, six three/six foot three?
 
As a British English speaker, here's my take on this:

It's very hard (if it's even possible) to get a good sense of this without being able to see the whole thing, but absent context, I agree with the editor in every case. It seems to me that he/she has made your translations a little more natural to the context and individual style of the speakers. None of this has anything to do with American or British English.

Although your English is clearly very good, I'm not sure that you're ready to translate this kind of thing. A translator should be translating into his native language, not out of it.
 
I can't agree with the editor regarding numbers three and five. Number two isn't impossible, but if this is in a modern setting, the next scene might feature the teacher facing disciplinary action. Number five uses meters, which is utterly unnatural in American English.
 
Last edited:
GoesStation said:
I can't agree with the editor regarding numbers two and five.
Click to expand...

I take it you mean 3 and 5. Yes, I fully take your point about the inappropriacy of a teacher saying Are you deaf? but without knowing the context and the characters, we can't be certain that the teacher's character isn't deliberately written like that. In fact, I assumed it was.

Number five uses meters, which is utterly unnatural in American English.
Click to expand...

Yes, I missed that. I see what you mean and I agree the translation would work far better if the unit of measure were translated too. American and British readers wouldn't be too familiar with how tall 1.9 meters is, and even if we were, we wouldn't say 'one point nine meters', would we? I'd say 'one meter ninety'.
 
In my youth I had a friend who wanted to do simultaneous translation at the UN or someplace similar. I considered both his English and French to be flawless. He attended a special college to learn and get certified. Although at college they translated in both directions, once they started work they were only allowed to translate into their mother tongue.
 
Last edited:
My mother translated many scientific papers from various Slavic languages into English, which was her fourth or fifth language. She wouldn't have hesitated to do the same for literary works; after all, her first submission to the very prestigious Atlantic Monthly was accepted and published — with no corrections needed — just fifteen years after she first lived in an Anglophone environment.

She was obviously exceptional though. The general rule that translators and interpreters should target only their native language is a good one.
 
I thank everyone for their responses.

I agree that in AE and BrE, no one uses the metric system. But somehow, this is company policy (??). Why, I really don't know. I've explained to them before that everyone in the English-speaking world uses the imperial system, but still they did nothing.

I can't break the confidentiality agreement by showing the comic, but I'll try to explain the contexts:

1) "No matter how I see it/look at it, she's just a weak girl. How did she do that?" The girl character just broke a sword with her bare hands.
What's the difference between the two? Is the first plain wrong?

2) "Which class are you two from/in?" - Teacher is asking two truant students which class they belong to.

3) The teacher is feeling a little impatient, but not furious. The literal translation is more like a). I find "Are you deaf" pretty rude myself.

4) "too high up/too high" - Something is pinned on the wall above a blackboard and a student is trying to reach it. Is "too high up" acceptable in this case?

5) Ignoring the use of the metric system, is "Isn't he like 6 foot 2?" far more natural than "Is he 6 foot 2?"

The fact is, I can't get a job if I do English-to-Chinese translations: my Chinese is nowhere as good as the Mainland Chinese, and they have legions of English-to-Chinese translators there. They generally don't have a problem understanding English, but only in expressing themselves. My Chinese-to-English translations will be vetted and touched up by a native editor. I don't think they can find enough native English speakers to do the translation job--well, not at the rate they are offering anyway. That's why an incompetent translator like myself can get this part-time job, LOL.

Since language learning is a long journey, it's never too late to learn from a native speaker, right? Although honestly, I can't see myself doing another comic.
 
Mandel1 said:
1) "No matter how I see it/look at it, she's just a weak girl. How did she do that?" The girl character just broke a sword with her bare hands.
What's the difference between the two? Is the first plain wrong?
Click to expand...

I won't say see is wrong, but look at is a little better in this expression.

4) "too high up/too high" - Something is pinned on the wall above a blackboard and a student is trying to reach it. Is "too high up" acceptable in this case?
Click to expand...

Yes, but it's really unnecessary, and so it's less likely that somebody would say it. For that reason, I'd get rid of the up.

5) Ignoring the use of the metric system, is "Isn't he like 6 foot 2?" far more natural than "Is he 6 foot 2?"
Click to expand...

This is not related to naturalness in any way. The inclusion of like is to approximate. Obviously, the speaker doesn't know his exact height.

The fact is, I can't get a job if I do English-to-Chinese translations
Click to expand...

Yes, I completely understand. I didn't mean to be discouraging. I wish you all the best.
 
My country, Canada, officially adopted the metric system several decades ago. But nearly everyone still uses the customary units (pounds, feet and inches) to measure people's height and weight. A good many people also still use miles for driving distances and speeds. Our political leaders want us to go metric, but we the people are evidently reluctant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mandel1 said:
Hi all,

This is my first post. I do web novel translations part-time for a Chinese company, Chinese to English. I am not a native speaker of English, so please feel free to point out my errors. [STRIKE]:)[/STRIKE]

Just last week, I was asked to translate a chapter of a manhua (a Chinese comic strip). Since the client was important, my translation was edited many times, with plenty of amendments/edits/changes. The client asked for American English, but I was brought up using British English.

One editor is based in the US, and I assume he/she is a native speaker of American English. Most of his or her changes are clear improvements, but I'm wondering about a few others.

These include:

1) No matter how I see it -->

That's not natural.

No matter how I look at it

That is.

(Is there a difference between these two,

Yes. One makes sense, one doesn't.

or is the second the only one correct?)

Only the second is correct.

2) Which class are you two from? -->

That's natural if you're asking about social class: rich, middle class, working class.

Which class are you two in?

That's natural if you're asking about a class in school.

(Are both acceptable, or is the second more correct in AE?)

It depends on the context.

3) Didn't you hear me? I called you so many times! -->

That's a little stilted. More likely:

- I've been calling on you!

- I've called on you over and over!

Are you deaf? I've been calling you! (Which sounds more natural? The speaker is a teacher who is a little angry with an unresponsive student. The literal meaning is more like the first, but isn't the amended version a little rude?)

That's more natural, but you're right, it's rude. So it depends on the context.

4) It's too high up! I can't reach it! --> It's too high! I can't reach it! (Is "too high up" wrong?)

Both are fine and mean the same thing.

5) Wow, he's so tall! Is he 1.9 meters... ? --> Wow, he's so tall! Isn't he like 1.9 meters? (I know the second is correct, but does the first sound natural in AE or BrE?)

In this context, an American would never say "meters"!

Otherwise, both are natural, depending on the context. Using "like" that way is very slangy.

I'm asking this because I want to know if my English is good enough to translate comic strips, which demand more idiomatic, informal, natural-sounding English. I was brought up under the British system, so please feel free to point out any differences between BrE and AE (if any) in the examples above. Any input will be much appreciated!
Click to expand...
That's what I know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

A
  • Locked
Naturalness of the following conversation
Replies
4
Views
1K
GoesStation
G
Sammy Sam
  • Locked
The concept of naturalness
2
Replies
21
Views
1K
5jj
5jj
L
  • Locked
Lack of naturalness
Replies
12
Views
3K
lo2
L
G
Religion on Ukraine, more than sixty billion dollars in assistance, loudly, there was, following
Replies
8
Views
182
svetlana14
S
S
Can I use effectively the following model of learning and communicating with an AI?
Replies
1
Views
87
5jj
5jj
Back
Top