UsingEnglish.com

Poll: Less people

Less people

Good English
Acceptable English
Bad English
Awful English

Statistics Poll Stats

This Poll:

  • Votes: 458
  • Comments: 8
  • Added: January 2004

Comments:

Vidableek

Why is it bad english? Saying "There was less people than yesterday" sounds perfectly fine to me.

Tektek

YUP!!! -less pple- sounds gr8!

steve3d

I would use "fewer" to refer to a number and "less" to refer to an amount, e.g. "fewer people" and "less snow."

nameless

get over these

phetmike

Fewer is a better word

old gobbo

@vidableek: would you consider saying "There were less people than yesterday", because 'people' is undoubtedly plural ? If so, then I think you would find that 'fewer' went more naturally into the phrase than 'less' does. Yes, I agree that it is something of a misleading pedantry to insist on 'fewer' for nouns of quantity on all occasions (cf. Old English partitive genitive of l�s [sorry, cannot manage the accent]), but 'custom and usage' give 'fewer' the edge in educated speech.

Helen

It isn't pedantic to use fewer - it is simply correct grammar in this sentence! It's laziness to say it doesn't matter.

tasmanman

Bad English, but awful is overstating it.

Browse our language polls:

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25

Trustpilot